Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in web 2.0
http://journal05.magtech.org.cn/jweb_glpl/CN/Y2024/V31/I7/97 WebbBelk (2014) proposes the term pseudo-sharing to refer to practices in which there are motivations mediated by profit, expectations of reciprocity and little sense of community and collaboration, which would make it synonymous with collaborative consumption ( Vasques, 2015).
Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in web 2.0
Did you know?
Webb3. «Sharing-Society» – Warum bereichsübergreifende Ressortforschung dazu? Ja, es braucht bereichsübergreifende Ressortforschung, denn Themen beschäftigen meist … Webb1 sep. 2015 · Sharing instead of buying is regaining traction among today's consumers. This study aims at identifying segments of sharing consumers to unearth potentially …
Webb1 jan. 2024 · The first study involved a content analysis of online qualitative documents describing characteristics of sharing and exchange related to both organizations (Section 3.3.1 and 3.4.1). The second study follows the methodology of the first, although the data was gathered from research articles related exclusively to Airbnb (Section 3.3.2). Webbspecifically enabled or enhanced by Internet technologies, the paper argues that pseudo-sharing is distinguished by the presence of profit motives, the absence of feelings of …
Webb1 sep. 2015 · Sharing instead of buying is regaining traction among today's consumers. This study aims at identifying segments of sharing consumers to unearth potentially … Webb3 juli 2012 · This paper argues that a new meaning of sharing has emerged in the context of Web 2.0 with three main features: fuzzy objects of sharing; the use of the word ‘share’ …
Webb4 okt. 2024 · Our article focuses on a non-standard sharing example that harbors the potential to disrupt received wisdom on the sharing economy. Although, originally, …
WebbBy detailing four types of pseudo-sharing and four types of sharing that are specifically enabled or enhanced by Internet technologies, the paper argues that pseudo-sharing is … dar-lings learning center carrollton texasWebbSharing versus pseudo-sharing in web 2.0. Anthropologist: 7–23. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1630.3842. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar] Benkler, Yochai. … darlings in the franksWebbSecondly, according to the two dimensions of expression and subject type, it puts forward a classification method of ‘Nine-square’ method for sharing economy, which can divide sharing economy into nine types, and classifies current industries in … bismarck school district north dakotabismarck sda church ustreamWebb24 okt. 2003 · Chief among remote-staff volunteer's concerns was the initiative to convert many of the volunteer accounts from overhead accounts, which had access to tools and privileges that made remote-staff volunteers' duties on par with in-house employees, to unbilled or discounted accounts. bismarck sd airportWebb1 nov. 2024 · Overall, our study shows that public sector sharing appears to exhibit a much higher degree of complexity than other types of sharing economy, which arises from the different motivations, values and ways of working among the various organizations and community groups involved. darling skin care west seattleWebb6 aug. 2024 · Belk, R. 2014b. Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0. Anthropologist 18: 7-23. 10.1080/09720073.2014.11891518 Search in Google Scholar. Benkler, Y. 2004. … bismarck sea on map