WebJun 15, 2024 · FACTS: In 1936, Tranquilino Lagman, a Filipino citizen whom have attained the age of 20, is being compelled by Section 60 of the Commonwealth Act 1, otherwise … WebPhilippine Communications Satellite Corporation Vs. Alcaraz G.R. No. 84818 December 18, 1989 Facts: Petitioner, Philippine Communications Satellite Corporation, or PHILCOMSAT is a public utility service provider that is the only one of its kind operating in the Philippines, and seeks to annul and set aside an Order Issued by respondent, Jose Luis Alcuaz, of the …
Benedicto C. Lagman, et al., vs. Hon. Enrique Medina, et al.
WebAug 26, 2024 · A. “Lagman’s narrative (on the Plaza Miranda bombing and Ninoy Aquino’s death) is an example of historical revisionism by selective omission”. Last week, allies of Presidents Cory Aquino and Noynoy Aquino recalled past events in Philippine history and twisted the facts to suit their political agenda. They are guilty of historical ... WebDec 6, 2024 · Composed of the incumbent governor general as the presidente (presiding officer), four oidores (equivalent to associate justices), an asesor (legal adviser), an alguacil mayor (chief constable), among other officials, the Real Audiencia de Manila was both a trial and appellate court. It had exclusive original, concurrent original, and exclusive ... location of upper trapezius
LAGMAN VS. MEDIALDEA- G.R. No. 231658 - Philippine Law - Digest
WebApr 12, 2024 · Members of the Filipino Nurses United (FNU) hold protest placards during their National Congress demonstration march in Manila, followed by a program in front of the Philippine General Hospital along Taft Avenue in Manila ... WebThree years later, it was KRMR's (now Komiteng Rebolusyonaryo ng Metro Manila-Rizal) turn to fragment. Lagman was expelled for acts violating the basic principles of collective leadership and democratic centralism. His character was also said to be unbecoming of a “proletarian revolutionary.” The rift, Lagman says, arose from his perceived ... WebAs early as 1966, Lagman v. City of Manila [53] clarified that the authority to issue certificates of public convenience does not remove a local government's power to regulate traffic in its locality. A grantee is still required to comply with … indian railway accounts code volume ii